A greater challenge to Obama than a strong debater – Global Public Square

I’ve long argued that Romney is an intelligent man trapped in a party that has forced him to embrace extreme and impossible positions. President Obama seemed passive, detached and glum. The Republican Party might hate Obama enough and be frustrated enough, to wink and let him do it.

If so, Obama faces something far more challenging than a good debater in the last weeks of the campaign.

But what’s more significant than how Romney said things was what he said.

By Fareed Zakaria

Romney repeatedly insisted that he was not advocating a big tax cut. Minutes after the Denver presidential debate, the pundits declared Mitt Romney the clear winner. He would cut funding for public broadcasting, which was 0.01% of federal spending in 2012. In fact, he declared unequivocally that he would not cut taxes at all if they added to the deficit at all. It’s only on the 5th that they diverge. He seemed engaged, forceful and punchy. And he was. Medicare was 13%.


- 5 reasons Obama fumbled

- Reality check: Romney’s tax pledge

- What’s next in the White House race?

- Face check: Pink slip for Big Bird?

Watch “Fareed Zakaria GPS” Sundays at 10 a.m. In a very smart analysis, NPR pointed out that Romney now has a five-point stump speech.

Sometimes the conventional wisdom is right. The first four points are actually identical to Barack Obama’s stump speech: he argues for (1) Exports (2) Domestic energy (3) Retraining and (4) Deficit reduction. . Romney talks about small businesses, Obama about national security.

But, anyway that appears to be off the table. He faces a moderate Republican. and 1 p.m. One of his advisers had predicted that once the Republican primaries were over, Romney would erase the image from the primaries and, like an Etch-a-Sketch, just draw a new one. Well, he appears to be doing just that. The candidate has been reworking his stump speech. ET on CNN.

Romney’s transformation did not happen overnight. Romney is also in favor of regulations, including parts of the Dodd-Frank bill, and repeatedly held up as a model his health care plan in Massachusetts, which has at its center the individual mandate, and on which Obamacare is based. Romney does claim that he would eliminate deductions and cut spending to pay for it but he hasn’t given any details. Now, as the Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler points out in his fact checking column, for two years Romney has been campaigning on a tax cut that that would cost around $5 trillion over 10 years. Well, he offered one at the debate

Posted by admin on May 13th, 2016 :: Filed under Uncategorized
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.